Posted in beliefs, conversations, etiquette, philosophy, pluralism, reflections, religion

Some reflections on an article which just popped into my inbox

Original Article: To Use Beliefs or Be Used by Them: THAT Is the Question

Reflection: The article is an excellent piece of writing which highlights that we need to embrace the philosophy of ‘we agree to disagree’ without being offensive though. I believe, being too much on one side does not show your loyality to that ideology but shows your inflexibility to appreciate the varied stream of thoughts and ideologies, whether it comes from literature, sacred text or everyday conversations. If you cannot talk comfortably over a tough terrain, you are just complacent with what is presumed to be tried and tested. If you fail to understand it is not a critique but a meta-reflection/meta-analysis of some ideas which are taken for granted and passed on, for example quotations. You do not want to learn and you do not want to ‘create’ your own world-views while assimilating the other in the conversation and also the other in the topic/belief/piece/person of discussion; therefore helping in no contribution to the knowledge realm at least for yourself. You are not being true to yourself. Who understood introspective and meditation as isolatary processes failed to understand the purpose of it in the first place, though debatable.

Advertisements

Author:

a coffee addict/ optimist sun flower/ can't-live-without-50mm photographer/ writing enthusiast/ [an almost inexistent] paper cookie smasher/ orange things collector/ wishes he had two antennas on the head; ps: philosophy-pistachio & educational technologist. to sound little proper: A self-taught, internationally published, photographer who loves to write/blog and read while breathing philosophy in between. Graduate of M.Ed. in Teacher Education with High Honors from Aga Khan University and currently works at the same university as Education Designer for Blended Learning. Candidate for Social Innovation in Digital Context (SIDC) at Lunds Universitet funded by Swedish Institute. Action Partner for Oxfam International Youth Partnership 2010-2013 led by Oxfam Australia. To cut the conversation short, an optimistic realist who believe in designing his life to fulfill dreams while sipping countless cups of coffee! I hope this makes some sense. http://www.raheellakhani.com

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s